Date of Award

2025

Document Type

Thesis

Degree Name

Master of Science in Speech-Language Pathology

Department

Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD)

Committee Chair and Members

Gina Youmans, Chair

Stacy Bastien-Renelique

George Pagano

Mayya Teytel-Cocozza

Keywords

African American, English Assessment tasks, Black English, Black English speech, Diagnostic testing, Speech therapy

Abstract

Language assessment is a fundamental aspect of the speech-language therapist's role. However, a critical examination of standardized assessments reveals their historical association with constructing disability and exerting control over individuals with a disability, often rooted in the medical model of disability (Nair et al., 2023). As a result, there has been a growing interest in developing alternative methods for evaluating language and speech, particularly in diverse populations (Hyter, 2022). This interest has extended to the study of assessment methods within urban communities, including African American English (AAE) speakers.

Language assessment is a fundamental aspect of the speech-language therapist's role. However, a critical examination of standardized assessments reveals their historical association with constructing disability and exerting control over individuals with a disability, often rooted in the medical model of disability (Nair et al., 2023). As a result, there has been a growing interest in developing alternative methods for evaluating language and speech, particularly in diverse populations (Hyter, 2022). This interest has extended to the study of assessment methods within urban communities, including African American English (AAE) speakers.

The author's CAT findings indicate that the recommended practices tend to overlook the influence of the specific assessment tasks used, often intertwining socioeconomic status (SES) with the language profiles of African American speakers. Furthermore, methodological weaknesses and ideological biases were identified. This CAT highlights the implications of these variations and the oversight of task effects on language assessment practices within the discipline, emphasizing the need for critical reflection and potential adjustments in assessment methods to ensure equitable evaluations for all populations.

Share

COinS